We have seem
the connection between "composition of functions" and "inverse functions".
When working with inverse functions, the following statements are true:
f (f -1(x)) = x and also in reverse f -1(f (x)) = x
The composition returns the x-value of the starting function, creating the identity line y = x.
A function composed with its inverse creates the identity line y = x.
Since exponential functions and logarithmic functions are inverses we can write:
The graphing calculator can quickly show whether the composition of two functions creates the Identity Function y = x, thus making the two functions inverses of one another.
The exponential function "composed" with the logarithmic function creates the line y = x.

FYI: The inverse function of a logarithm is called an antilogarithm (or antilog).
Given: y = log10(x), then antilog(y) = 10y = x.
Shouldn't we just call the inverse of a logarithm an "exponential" ?
Yes, we can. But, when logarithms first came on the scene, they were not associated with exponentials, thus the word "antilogarithm". Their association with exponentials was established later. |

Let's take a look at the graphs when 0 < b < 1, such as b = 0.5.
Exponential function, g(x), and logarithmic function, g-1(x):